Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 4875 (1.87 seconds)

Gurnam Kaur vs Meena Kumari on 13 July, 2017

regarding the period from December 31st, 2010 to December 31st, 2020. The Basic Sum Assured was Rs.10.00 lacs. An amount ... Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the Act, 1986) with a prayer that the opposite parties be directed to pay an amount
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Huda vs Sunita Sharma on 26 August, 2015

development works in the area failing which the HUDA was liable to pay interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the amount deposited ... complainant filed complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 averring that the HUDA wrongly charged interest on the instalments amount without offering
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Sh. Aditya Sharma vs Dlf Universal Limited on 9 March, 2016

Director/Authorized Representative.               .... Opposite Parties Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. BEFORE: JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT.                 MR. DEV RAJ, MEMBER ... name and style of "Hyde Park Estate", New Chandigarh, Mullanpur, basic sale price whereof, was Rs.89,24,934.72Ps. plus External Development
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 17 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Krishan Kumar Sachdeva vs M/S Emaar Mgf Land Pvt. Limited on 2 March, 2015

Chandigarh.               .... Opposite Parties Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986   BEFORE: JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT.                 MR. DEV RAJ, MEMBER.                 MRS. PADMA ... square yard, vide Provisional Allotment letter dated 05.05.2007 Annexure C-2. The basic price of the said plot was to the tune
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next