Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 36 (1.36 seconds)

M S Meena vs M/O Finance on 3 June, 2016

impugned amendment and is, therefore, violative of the basic structure of the Constitution. The said amendment is, therefore, constitutionally invalid and is liable ... fundamental right of equality which is part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The petitioners say that the equality in the context of Article
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Sobti vs M/O Finance on 3 June, 2016

impugned amendment and is, therefore, violative of the basic structure of the Constitution. The said amendment is, therefore, constitutionally invalid and is liable ... fundamental right of equality which is part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The petitioners say that the equality in the context of Article
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P Chinnasamy vs M/O Finance on 3 June, 2016

impugned amendment and is, therefore, violative of the basic structure of the Constitution. The said amendment is, therefore, constitutionally invalid and is liable ... fundamental right of equality which is part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The petitioners say that the equality in the context of Article
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Parthasarthi De vs D/O Revenue on 3 June, 2016

impugned amendment and is, therefore, violative of the basic structure of the Constitution. The said amendment is, therefore, constitutionally invalid and is liable ... fundamental right of equality which is part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The petitioners say that the equality in the context of Article
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pardeep vs M/O Railways on 4 March, 2016

that there is no violation of the basic structure by any of the impugned amendments, including the Constitution (Eighty-Second) Amendment Act, 2000 . Paragraph reads ... case, there is no violation of the basic structure by any of the impugned amendments, including the Constitution (Eighty-Second) Amendment Act, 2000 . The constitutional
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lokendra Kumar vs M/O Railways on 4 March, 2016

that there is no violation of the basic structure by any of the impugned amendments, including the Constitution (Eighty-Second) Amendment Act, 2000 . Paragraph reads ... case, there is no violation of the basic structure by any of the impugned amendments, including the Constitution (Eighty-Second) Amendment Act, 2000 . The constitutional
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Satish Kumar vs M/O Railways on 4 March, 2016

that there is no violation of the basic structure by any of the impugned amendments, including the Constitution (Eighty-Second) Amendment Act, 2000 . Paragraph reads ... case, there is no violation of the basic structure by any of the impugned amendments, including the Constitution (Eighty-Second) Amendment Act, 2000 . The constitutional
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next