Mahmadhusen Abdulrahim Kalota Shaikh vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 October, 2008
Author
Mohammed Illyas vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 15 September, 1990
Equivalent citations: ILR1991KAR2804
JUDGMENT
Constitution of India is a part of the
basic structure doctrine and cannot be taken away by any
subordinate legislation.
b) Section
that
abrogates or abridges such rights would be violative of
the basic structure doctrine. The actual effect and impact
of the law on the rights ... taken into account in determining whether or not it
destroys the basic structure.
(ii) Article 21 of the Constitution in its broad perspective
seeks
abrogates
or abridges such rights would be violative of the basic
16
structure doctrine. The actual effect and impact of the law on
the rights ... taken into
account in determining whether or not it destroys the basic
structure.
(ii) Article 21 of the Constitution in its broad perspective
seeks
Chetan Sharma vs State & Another on 17 November, 2016
Author: Sanjiv Khanna
Bench: Sanjiv
that abrogates or abridges such rights would be
violative of the basic structure doctrine.
(ii) Article 21 takes with its fold enforcement of rights ... High
Courts, which being an integral part of basic structure, no
act of parliament can exclude or curtail the powers
this
country. Rule of law is a basic feature of
our constitution, it is a doctrine basic
structure. Rule of law affirm supremacy of
court
fundamental right under article 14 and 21
and also abrogation of basic structure (doctrine of basic
structure) which are inviolable by any authority
that abrogates or abridges such
rights would be violative of the basic structure
doctrine. The actual effect and impact of the law on
the rights ... taken
into account in determining whether or not it destroys
the basic structure.
(ii) Article 21 of the Constitution in its broad
perspective seeks