Sahara India vs Basmati Devi on 21 July, 2017
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI
(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)
Date ... Kalyanpuri, Delhi-110019
(Through its authorized representative) .........Appellants
Versus
1. Smt. Basmati Devi
W/o Late Ramlakhan
RPF Line, Jhuggi No. B-135
Daya Basti
that he is an agriculturist and
purchased 30 Kg seed of Pussa Basmati- 1509 from OP No.1
vide bill ... seed, therefore, mixed crop had grown which damaged the
whole crop of basmati. Due to mix seed complainant suffered
loss
credit facility from ICICI Bank. The
complainant purchased 4701 quintals of Basmati Rice vide Bill
Nos. 1401, 1404, 1405, 1431 and 1432 dated ... complainant pledged 4701 quintals
First Appeal No. 657 of 2016 3
of Basmati Rice valuing Rs. 1,17,52,500/- with ICICI Bank, with
credit
Sauni-2014. Ops
advertised with great pump and show that Pussa-1121 Basmati
seed is of very high quality seed and average yield would ... plantation, it
was noticed that crop was not looking like Pussa-1121 Basmati,
rather, it was looking like simple paddy crop. Accordingly, he
moved
period from 10.10.2014 to
09.11.2014 covering 5200 bags of Non Basmati Parboiled Rice situated
at CFS Shravan, Vishakapatnam, for a sum insured ... period from
10.10.2014 to 09.11.2014 covering 5200 bags of Non-Basmati Parboiled
Rice in shed situated at CFS Shravan Vishakhapatnam for a sum
insured
that as per documents supplied by
complainant on 26.12.2014, 600 Bags of Basmati Rice Steam
weighing 298.38 quintal worth Rs.19,00,279/- were sent
2200/- on 10.08.2011. He sprayed weedicide on crop of paddy basmati sown in five acres of land and just after few days the crop
