against original order of D.C.L.R. dismissing their
Bataidari Case under section 48E of the Act on the ground of
there being lack ... Bataidars
started a second round of litigation by once again filing
Bataidari Cases, 28 in numbers, in the year 1994-95.
Mr. Siya Ram Shahi
against original order of D.C.L.R. dismissing their
Bataidari Case under section 48E of the Act on the ground of
there being lack ... Bataidars
started a second round of litigation by once again filing
Bataidari Cases, 28 in numbers, in the year 1994-95.
Mr. Siya Ram Shahi
staying
order dated 15.01.2005 passed by D.C.L.R. in
Bataidari case no. 6/1997-98, which was lodged by
the complainant opposite party ... stayed. So, the
proceeding be quashed.
-3-
5. So far claim of Bataidari raised by
complainant opposite party no.2 is concerned, it is
undisputedly
impugned. Accordingly the order
dated 02.02.2002, passed by the Collector,
Madhubani in Bataidari Appeal no. 33 of
1999-2000 is hereby quashed and this
application ... impugned. Accordingly the order
dated 02.02.2002, passed by the
Collector, Madhubani in Bataidari
Appeal no. 33 of 1999-2000 is
hereby quashed and this application
impugned. Accordingly the order
dated 02.02.2002, passed by the Collector,
Madhubani in Bataidari Appeal no. 33 of
1999-2000 is hereby quashed and this
application ... impugned. Accordingly the order
dated 02.02.2002, passed by the
Collector, Madhubani in Bataidari
Appeal no. 33 of 1999-2000 is
hereby quashed and this application
Rajendra Yadav who is
bataidar of the informant to refrain himself from bataidari.
They also threatened the laborers working in the field of the
informant
gold-
Mangalsootra from the informant. The occurrence took place for
doing Bataidari land of Buchchi Chaudhary by informant.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
while the informant was sowing seeks and sprinkling
fertilizers in his bataidari field, all the FIR named accused
persons came there and started assaulting
decimals and 93/52 area
6 decimals on the basis of bataidari case no.13/97 and
proceeding
submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that there was Bataidari dispute with the
informant as a result of which the present case has been
