passed by the
Deputy Collector Land Reform, Nirmali
(Respondent No. 4) in Bataidari Case No. 01 of
2013-14.
iii. For issuance of appropriate writ ... land by hook or
crook, fabricated a false story of bataidari and filed a Bataidari
Patna High Court CWJC No.10663
District Magistrate-Collector, Madhubani.
3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms-cum-Bataidari Magistrate, Benipatti,
District Madhubani.
4. The Subdivisional Officer cum Bataidari Magistrate, Benipatti, District ... filed for quashing
order dated 28.11.2022 passed by the Collector, Madhubani in
Bataidari Appeal Case No. 99 of 2008-09 by which he has
Patna
Distt.- Madhubani
7. The Circle Officer, Khutauna, Circle Khutauna, Distt.- Madhubani
8. Bataidari Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, Distt.- Madhubani
9. Bhola Ram S/O Late Ramdhari ... land of those landlord
who has participa -ted in the alleged bataidari
proceedings at the instance of the Respondent No. 9.
iii. For issuance
clock in
the day time the informant was harvesting paddy in his Bataidari
field and his nephew Shivendra Paswan and Dilip Paswan were
easing themselves ... going on. The motive behind the alleged occurrence was that
the disputed Bataidari land was purchased by Raj Kumar Yadav @
Raja Yadav and was restraining
clock in
the day time the informant was harvesting paddy in his Bataidari
field and his nephew Shivendra Paswan and Dilip Paswan were
easing themselves ... going on. The motive behind the alleged occurrence was that
the disputed Bataidari land was purchased by Raj Kumar Yadav @
Raja Yadav and was restraining
clock in
the day time the informant was harvesting paddy in his Bataidari
field and his nephew Shivendra Paswan and Dilip Paswan were
easing themselves ... going on. The motive behind the alleged occurrence was that
the disputed Bataidari land was purchased by Raj Kumar Yadav @
Raja Yadav and was restraining
clock in
the day time the informant was harvesting paddy in his Bataidari
field and his nephew Shivendra Paswan and Dilip Paswan were
easing themselves ... going on. The motive behind the alleged occurrence was that
the disputed Bataidari land was purchased by Raj Kumar Yadav @
Raja Yadav and was restraining
Rajendra Yadav who is
bataidar of the informant to refrain himself from bataidari.
They also threatened the laborers working in the field of the
informant
East Champaran at Motihari., whereby the appeal of the
petitioner being Bataidari Case No. 3 of 1997-98 has been
dismissed vide order date ... also
prayed for quashing of the order dated 20.12.1996, whereby the
Bataidari case has been dismissed on the basis of so-called local
inspection
order
dated 25.06.2003 passed by learned Collector, Katihar
(Respondent no.2) in Bataidari Appeal No. 688 of
1999-2000 whereby and whereunder he has dismissed
