partnership firm
and had business dealings with Respondent -
accused. Respondent had purchased battery plates
from the complainant and against such transaction,
on 18th ... accused entered the
witness box and deposed that she did purchase the
battery plates and had issued the concerned two
cheques. She stated that when
that the petitioner had
placed orders for purchase of shares of Amaraja Battery Ltd. in settlement
number 10 and issued cheques for Rs.19 lakhs ... petitioner, respondent No.1 purchased shares of the said
Amaraja Battery Ltd. on behalf of the petitioner on 12 th March
business of manufacturing and sale
2
of Industrial and Automobile batteries both in India as
well as various countries of India ocean ... Partners,
involved in the business of recycling of used lead acid
batteries. Complainant entered into an agreement on
15.03.2018 with accused permitting the accused
Grand Batteries Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. vs M/S Osaka Alloys & Steel Pvt. Ltd. on 3 November, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE ... 2016, IA No. 01/2016
Date of order:03.11.2018
M/s Grand Batteries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. vs. M/s Osaka Alloya and Steels
company. The complainant company is
manufacturing various industrial, telecommunication, railways and
automotive batteries etc. A-1 purchased various batteries and
made payments promptly till September ... Managing Director, placed purchase order on
14.12.2011 for purchasing batteries mentioned in the purchase
order. The complainant company supplied the same at the office
Madan Batteries And Anothers vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 31 October, 2019
Author: Rajiv Joshi
Bench: Rajiv Joshi
HIGH COURT ... APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38861 of 2019
Applicant :- M/S Madan Batteries And Anothers
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel
Chauhan Battery House vs State Of U.P. And Another on 19 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION ... Applicant :- M/S Chauhan Battery House
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party
Sujith vs M/S.Amman Battery Industries on 14 June, 2019
Author: N.Anand Venkatesh
Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh
1
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Sujith .. Petitioner
Vs.
M/s.Amman Battery Industries,
Represented by its Senior Manager/Authorized
Signatory,
Kumar having its Registered Office
Amara Raja Batteries Limited vs Ghanshyam Lal Agarwal on 10 February, 2023
Bench: Abhay S. Oka , Dipankar Datta
ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.17 SECTION ... High Court Of Andhra Pradesh At Amravati)
M/S AMARA RAJA BATTERIES LIMITED Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
GHANSHYAM LAL AGARWAL & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION
Traders & Anr vs Meethu Battery House on 11 May, 2018
Author: Arvind Singh Sangwan
Bench: Arvind Singh Sangwan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB ... Decision: 11.05.2018
A.K.Traders and another ... Petitioners
V/S
Mithu Battery House Proprietor .. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present
