appeals
preferred by the respondent-assessee, and held that cell phone battery
charger is sold as composite package along with cell phone, and hence said ... made sales of 1,07,2679 pieces of cell phones
with battery chargers and had paid tax at the rate of 4% on the sale
impleadment application (CM No. 3777/2014) on behalf of the "Battery
Rickshaw Welfare Association (Registered)" and the association was
impleaded as respondent ... raised in the present petition. The NCTD has not
yet classified the battery operated Cycle Rickshaws as
non-motorised vehicles or motorized vehicle in which
that the petitioner had
placed orders for purchase of shares of Amaraja Battery Ltd. in settlement
number 10 and issued cheques for Rs.19 lakhs ... petitioner, respondent No.1 purchased shares of the said
Amaraja Battery Ltd. on behalf of the petitioner on 12 th March
fact that the certificate granted by
the Lt. Colonel, Major Battery Commander, was, perhaps,
not correct, directed, on 18.02.2014 itself, that a Special
Investigating Team ... matter be placed on 04.04.2014 and, in the
meanwhile, the Major Battery Commander, 3323/332,
Medium Range, shall make available Nayak Amresh Kumar,
as early
engaged in the business of selling of different kinds of batteries.
For the assessment year 2001-02 under the U.P. Trade Tax Act (hereinafter ... assessment order dated 17.9.2004 subjecting trade tax on the sale of automotive batteries @ 12% and for the sale of tractor batteries @ 5% and for stationery
Battery & Electricals vs . Qureshi Oxide & Chemicals on 6 May, 2014
Author: Alok Sharma
Bench: Alok Sharma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ... RAJASTHAN
AT JAIPUR BENCH
ORDER
S.R. Battery & Electricals Vs. Qureshi Oxide & Chemicals
(S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.4158/2009)
DATE
Batteries Thru G.M. vs Parasmal Jain & Anr. on 10 November, 2014
Author: Alok Aradhe
Bench: Alok Aradhe
1
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH ... SEAT AT JABALPUR
First Appeal No.366/1997
M/s J.K. Batteries------------------Appellant
-V/s-
Parasmal Jain and Anr.------------Respondents
For the appellant
Chloride Alloys India Limited vs M/S Kirloskar Batteries India Private ... on 21 February, 2014
Author: Anand Byrareddy
Bench: Anand Byrareddy
-1-
IN THE HIGH ... Petitioner
(By Shri Shyam Koundinya A.S., Advocate)
And:
M/s. Kirloskar Batteries India Private Limited
Having its registered office
which the appellant has submitted as relating
to enquiry for purchase of battery and UPS required by
the assessee for his firm which has subsequently ... purchased as substantiated from the enclosed copy
of bills for purchase of battery. The fact that these
notings on the lower part of the page
appeals
preferred by the respondent-assessee, and held that cell phone battery
charger is sold as composite package along with cell phone, and hence said ... made sales of 1,07,2679 pieces of cell phones
with battery chargers and had paid tax at the rate of 4% on the sale
