take action
Under Section 320 of K.M.C. Act. Accordingly the
BBMP issued the Preliminary and Final Order
against the Appellant Under Section ... High Court of Karnataka the BBMP authorities
have taken action against the appellant under the
above said Act. In the above said Writ petitions
Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act,
1976 ['Act', for short]. Since the Respondent No.4 was not
responding to the said notice, the Respondent ... passed, inspite of the order passed under Section 462 of
the Act, BBMP has not initiated any action to implement
the order as per Annexures
Food Adulteration Act (at present Food Safety and
Standards Act ).
7. In the instant case the complainant had
approached BBMP for taking legal action against ... Company under the provision of Prevention of
Food Adulteration Act . It is only because the BBMP had
not responded for the representation of the complainant
five applications under Section 11 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('the Act of 1996'),
involving the same contesting parties and similar ... arbitration.
However, the question regarding eligibility of the
Commissioner, BBMP to act as an Arbitrator deserves to be
examined. As regards ineligibility of certain persons
relevant provisions of KMC Act , & Building
Bye-laws of BBMP by acting upon the representation i.e.,
Ann-F. and etc.
This writ petition
bound by the decree
to be passed and ultimately the BBMP would act in
accordance with law as per the decree passed by the
Civil
read with
Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. (In short
PC Act )
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case ... doing any official favour or for doing official act.
Admittedly, complainant had approached BBMP for obtaining
general license
immediately. A notice issued by BBMP to the owner.
There is no presumption that the complainant has
instigated BBMP to demolish it. Because ... premises without permission of the
owner, complainant has not acted lawfully. If by act of
BBMP, the premises itself is demolished, there is nothing
Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 (In short PC Act ).
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case is as under ... facie
show some collusion between PW4 and PW6 to act against the
interest of BBMP. Apart from this in cross-examination
only
provisional order passed under Section 321(1) of the said
Act. The BBMP did not passed final order in respect of
alleged deviations ... Section 321(3) of said Act. The plaintiffs also not
produced the said final order passed by the BBMP. To
prove
