Whether the ITAT erred in holding that services provided by
IMG to BCCI under the Service Agreement dated 24.9.2009 qualify
1
Tribunal
2
AYs
Signature ... when services provided by IMG, during the
relevant year, were utilized by BCCI outside India?‖
2. The said questions as they arise in this batch
Whether the ITAT erred in holding that services provided by
IMG to BCCI under the Service Agreement dated 24.9.2009 qualify
1
Tribunal
2
AYs
Signature ... when services provided by IMG, during the
relevant year, were utilized by BCCI outside India?‖
2. The said questions as they arise in this batch
Whether the ITAT erred in holding that services provided by
IMG to BCCI under the Service Agreement dated 24.9.2009 qualify
1
Tribunal
2
AYs
Signature ... when services provided by IMG, during the
relevant year, were utilized by BCCI outside India?‖
2. The said questions as they arise in this batch
Whether the ITAT erred in holding that services provided by
IMG to BCCI under the Service Agreement dated 24.9.2009 qualify
1
Tribunal
2
AYs
Signature ... when services provided by IMG, during the
relevant year, were utilized by BCCI outside India?‖
2. The said questions as they arise in this batch
Whether the ITAT erred in holding that services provided by
IMG to BCCI under the Service Agreement dated 24.9.2009 qualify
1
Tribunal
2
AYs
Signature ... when services provided by IMG, during the
relevant year, were utilized by BCCI outside India?‖
2. The said questions as they arise in this batch
Whether the ITAT erred in holding that services provided by
IMG to BCCI under the Service Agreement dated 24.9.2009 qualify
1
Tribunal
2
AYs
Signature ... when services provided by IMG, during the
relevant year, were utilized by BCCI outside India?‖
2. The said questions as they arise in this batch
Whether the ITAT erred in holding that services provided by
IMG to BCCI under the Service Agreement dated 24.9.2009 qualify
1
Tribunal
2
AYs
Signature ... when services provided by IMG, during the
relevant year, were utilized by BCCI outside India?‖
2. The said questions as they arise in this batch
Whether the ITAT erred in holding that services provided by
IMG to BCCI under the Service Agreement dated 24.9.2009 qualify
1
Tribunal
2
AYs
Signature ... when services provided by IMG, during the
relevant year, were utilized by BCCI outside India?‖
2. The said questions as they arise in this batch
Whether the ITAT erred in holding that services provided by
IMG to BCCI under the Service Agreement dated 24.9.2009 qualify
1
Tribunal
2
AYs
Signature ... when services provided by IMG, during the
relevant year, were utilized by BCCI outside India?‖
2. The said questions as they arise in this batch
Rahul Mehra v. Union of India
& Ors.15 , BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar and Others16, BCCI
v. Cricket Association of Bihar17 ... Haryana24 , Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. v. Union
of India25 , BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar26, Mahipal Singh v.
Union of India
