written replies and oral submissions, BCCI raised the following
contentions:
BCCI is not an enterprise
9.1. BCCI is a not-for-profit society registered under ... BCCI Rules
9.22. The DG misinterpreted Rules 28(b) and Rule 28(d) of the BCCI rules
and held them anti-competitive, as they
sports rules can be identified: the "rules of the game"; "club rules" and
"competition rules".
- The "rules ... Linkages with ICC
8.15 BCCI is a full member of ICC and as such BCCI follows the rules/bye
laws made by ICC. Specifically, attention
largely patterned) provides for application of the rule of reason on vertical
restraints. Further, BCCI has drawn attention of the Commission towards
its order ... become per se anti-
competitiveā. Therefore, as per BCCI, it is well established jurisprudence
that the rule of reason applies to vertical restraints and appreciable
granted the approval sought for
nor has it placed any sanctions on BCCI in relation to its anti-competitive
conduct. The Informant further submitted that ... Section 32 )
and various rules relating to organisation of cricket, clearly indicate the
regulatory role of BCCI which empowers it to create entry barriers
Surinder Singh Barmi vs. Board for Control of Cricket in India (BCCI)
As per R. Prasad (Supplementary Order)
Order under Section 27 of the Competition ... Since the majority order has
dealt with the facts, relevant rules, byelaws of the BCCI and ICC, DG's observations
and arguments
Sh. Dhanraj Pillay And Others vs M/S Hockey India Main Order , Per R. ... on
necessity of fresh investigation to be done into the role of BCCI in respect of
its dominance or abuse of dominance when the Commission ... amended its rules
and regulations during pendency of the suit, the informant accordingly
amended its suits to get such rules and regulations declared illegal
Sh. Dhanraj Pillay And Others vs M/S Hockey India Main Order , Per R. ... on
M/S Santuka Associates Pvt. Ltd vs All India Organization Of Chemists And ... on 19