CrPC for the offence of begging defined 2(1)(1) of the Bombay
Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 read with 4(1) of Bombay Prevention ... committed an offence of begging
defined U/S2 (1) (i) of The Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 and you are
required
CrPC for the offence of begging defined 2(1)(1) of the Bombay
Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 read with 4(1) of Bombay Prevention ... committed an offence of begging
defined U/S2 (1) (i) of The Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 and you are
required
accused was found begging and he was arrested and was
proceeded U/S 4(1) of Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 and a kalandra ... offence U/S 2(1) (i) of the
Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 and Section 5(5) of the Bombay Prevention of
Begging Act
Children) Act, 2015 and Section 11 of the Maharashtra
Prevention of Begging Act, 1959.
2. The applicant is a lady aged about 60 years ... Children) Act, 2015 and
Section 11 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Begging Act,
1959 on her executing P.R. bond
sentence
dated 14.12.2012 passed by Ld. Special Metropolitan
Magistrate, Mobile Court, BPB Act, Jaivihar Road, Lajpat
Nagar-II, New Delhi Karkardooma Courts Delhi ... accordance with Section 5(5) of the Bombay
Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 and ordered to be kept for
one year in certified institution
appeal filed under
Section 34 of the Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959
(hereinafter referred as in the Act), enforced in Delhi r/w Section ... appellant was convicted u/s 5 (5) of
Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 and was sentenced to be
kept in a certified institution
Shiv Kumar Vs. State
Begging Act ( in short to be referred hereinafter as B.P.B.
Act ) case titled " State Vs. Shiv Kumar ... convict the accused Shiv Kumar, U/S
5 (5) B.P.B. Act on his pleading guilty and passed order for
detention of the convict
Dalip Kumar Vs. State
Begging Act (in short to be referred hereinafter as B.P.B.
Act ) case titled " State Vs. Dalip ", whereby ... convict the accused Dalip, U/S 5 (5) B.P.B. Act
on his pleading guilty and passed order for detention of the
convict
cannot be acted upon."
"(i) There is neither rule of law nor of
prudence that dying declaration cannot be
acted upon without corroboration ... Where dying declaration is suspicious
it should not be acted upon without
corroborative evidence. ( Rasheed Beg v.
State of Madhya Pradesh
neither rule of law nor of prudence that
dying declaration cannot be acted upon without corroboration.
[See Munnu Raja & Anr. v. The State ... dying declaration is suspicious, it should
not be acted upon without corroborative evidence. [See
Rasheed Beg v. State of Madhya Pradesh
