Court in these writ
petitions is with regard to the below benchmark ACRs (Annual
Confidential Reports) which were not communicated to the employees ... latter decision, a clear view
has been taken that below benchmark ACRs, which have not been
communicated, are not to be simply ignored
case of non-
communication of below benchmark ACRs. The court directed that adverse
ACRs below the benchmark which fell within the zone of consideration ... adverse ACR. In case, the ACR
is upgraded, making the incumbent eligible for consideration, review DPC
would be held based upon the reappraised ACRs
have retired, the ACR containing the below
bench mark grading would be ignored and an ACR prior to the last
ACR considered would be taken ... below-
benchmark' ACRs. Now, those ACRs have been reconsidered and have been
upgraded and fall above the benchmark. Thus, the obvious corollary is that
Grade inasmuch as he was found unfit
on account of below benchmark ACRs in the DPC held in September,
2009. Subsequently the below benchmark ACRs ... convened in that year on the ground of below
benchmark ACRs which were subsequently upgraded.
4 The fact of the matter is that the below
have retired, the ACR containing the below
bench mark grading would be ignored and an ACR prior to the last
ACR considered would be taken ... below-
benchmark' ACRs. Now, those ACRs have been reconsidered and have been
upgraded and fall above the benchmark. Thus, the obvious corollary is that
have retired, the ACR containing the below
bench mark grading would be ignored and an ACR prior to the last
ACR considered would be taken ... below-
benchmark' ACRs. Now, those ACRs have been reconsidered and have been
upgraded and fall above the benchmark. Thus, the obvious corollary is that
ACRs are concerned, the fact that the
ACRs themselves have been considered and marks have been awarded on
the basis of whether the ACRs were ... marks, 'good' ACRs are given 2 marks and
'average' ACRs are given 1 mark. Any ACR whether it is 'outstanding
allowed by directing that the condition of below benchmark ACRs ought not to be
considered and that he be granted the Assured Career Progression ... ACRs were
never communicated and it is only through the order dated 06.04.2011 that he was
informed that his ACRs were below the benchmark
directed to reconsider the ACR
grading for the year 2007, we declare that said year's ACR
grading be excluded while considering the entitlement ... year 2008, the petitioner was superseded on
account of the below benchmark ACR grading for the year 2007,
we direct that a Review
direction had been issued to communicate the adverse ACRs and also that the said ACRs
be ignored if the reviewing officer and reporting officer ... altogether ignore the
below benchmark ACRs and consider the further preceding year
ACR which were up to the benchmark. But we must confess that
nobody
