Search Results Page

Search Results

41 - 50 of 4104 (1.05 seconds)

Nand Lal Ram vs Textiles on 24 February, 2025

Scheme based MANISH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA 7 on the required benchmark grading, indicating eligibility for career progression under this scheme. Learned counsel for the respondents further ... gradings since 1.9.2008. Applicant No. 2 had mostly 'Average', or 'Good' gradings, with only one 'Very Good' grading since
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Abhijit Bhowmick vs M/O Power on 10 April, 2026

substance of these judgments are that in the event of below benchmark grading or/and adverse remarks found in the APAR for the relevant period ... promotion, if such adverse remarks or below benchmark grading are subsequently upgraded/expunged by the competent authority, its effect on the career prospects
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

H Sahoo vs Geological Survey Of India on 11 May, 2026

promotion to the said grade was due to below Benchmark grading in his APAR from 01.04.2012 to 31.03.2013 [2012-13]. RAVI KUMAR ... four Benchmark grading, out of five ACARs gradings, should be assessed fit for the post of Superintending Geologist. Accordingly, notwithstanding the below Benchmark grading
Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harbansh Singh vs Railway on 21 September, 2022

seven years in Selection Grade for promotion to Sr. Administrative Grade. As the applicant was promoted to Selection Grade with effect from 24.01.2008 the residency ... 00332/2011 promotion to Selection Grade, Grade, without sharing the below benchmark grading , was in accordance with the law prevailing at that time. (b) Whether
Central Administrative Tribunal - Patna Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3 4 5   6 7 8 9 10 Next