applicant
as Unfit as he could not achieve the requisite benchmark grading in the
ACRs.
3. The applicant has submitted as under ... applicant 'UNFIT' as he could not achieve the
requisite benchmark grading in the ACRs. On the basis of the said
assessment the Committee
applicant
as Unfit as he could not achieve the requisite benchmark grading in the
ACRs.
3. The applicant has submitted as under ... applicant 'UNFIT' as he could not achieve the
requisite benchmark grading in the ACRs. On the basis of the said
assessment the Committee
date (i.e. 23.05.2004). by
ignoring the un-communicated below benchmark
gradings in the relevant ACRs (2000-2001) with all
consequential benefits, including re-fixation ... 2969/2017
Court No. III
adverse remarks or below benchmark gradings in the
relevant ACRs, vitiate the decisions taken on the basis
of the said
above the benchmark is "Very Good". All
officers who have this benchmark are to be graded as fit for promotion. The
petitioners have ... provisions contained in the
relevant rules and guidelines about the benchmark grading were followed
in case of the petitioners but they were not recommended
instructions to her to
submit representation for upgradation of the below benchmark grading in
the ACRs to the second respondent. She produced copies ... other similarly affected officials to
represent against the adverse remarks/below benchmark grading in their
ACRs. The recommendation of the Scrutiny Committee will be considered
Scientist, who is aggrieved
by the adverse remarks, and the below benchmark grading
awarded to him in his APAR, and communicated to him through ... grading in the ACRs/APARs, came as a shock to him,
because he had been graded only as 'Good', but the Benchmark
applicants representation dated 01.07.2010 for upgradation of his below benchmark grading Good/ Average in respect of the period from ... held on 01.07.2011 and prior to that, the below benchmark gradings in ACRs under reference were communicated to the applicant, vide OM dated 17.06.2010 (page
rejecting his representation dated 29.09.2009 for cancellation of his below benchmark grading in the ACR for the period 28.05.2007 to 31.03.2008 (hereinafter referred ... ACRs where he has been given below benchmark grading and the representations against which have been rejected by R-2.
3. The applicants case
dated 25.08.2010 (Annexure-A), vide which his representation against the below benchmark gradings in his APAR for the period ... rejected, is arbitrary and illegal. Applicant also impugns below benchmark gradings in his ACRs for the year
gradings recorded in the confidential reports for the years 2001-02, 2002-03 and 2003-04 which are adverse gradings below the benchmark grading ... below the benchmark, is to be treated as adverse because it eliminates the candidate from consideration for promotion. Thus, the below benchmark gradings
