15600-39100/- with Grade Pay of
Rs.5400 to the grade of Executive Engineer (Civil) in PB-3 with
Grade Pay of Rs.6600 ... merit, the benchmark prescribed is good. "Only those officers who
obtained said benchmark are promoted in order of merit as per
gradings obtained. Thus
grading".
9. In the result the OA succeeds. The respondent is
directed to communicate to the Applicant ACR gradings, which
may be below benchmark ... performance review on account of the
below benchmark gradings and interview, were held to be unjustified.
Learned counsel contended that so far as the adverse
petitioner's complaint is that his Annual Confidential Report
(ACR) grading for the period 01.04.2005 to 24.10.2005 was wrongly
recorded by the then Reporting ... detriment. The petitioner's representation against the said below benchmark
grading was not heeded - the Reporting and Reviewing Officers rejected his
requests
prescribed eligibility conditions, such as experience, qualification,
relevant ACR gradings etc.
9. The reference to benchmark - in para 17 is only descriptive in the
sense ... financial up-gradation to the Grade Pay of
`7600 and above, the benchmark is "very good." In the present case, the
Grade
vacancies for the years 2011 and 2012 due to his
below-benchmark gradings for the two years. In the Central
Government's opinion, since ... sometime in October, 2010 when it became clear, given the
below benchmark ACR gradings of the lone eligible candidate, Sh.
A.K. Sharma, that
vacancies for the years 2011 and 2012 due to his
below-benchmark gradings for the two years. In the Central
Government's opinion, since ... sometime in October, 2010 when it became clear, given the
below benchmark ACR gradings of the lone eligible candidate, Sh.
A.K. Sharma, that
reason that his ineligibility on account of the below benchmark grading
was never brought to his notice. It is contended that contemporaneously and later ... found unfit for
promotion as DIG. The petitioner claims that the ACR grading of "good" was
never communicated to him and that inasmuch
succeeds. The respondents are
directed to consider the applicants for promotion to Grade-I
of DASS from the dates on which their immediate juniors
were ... Although among those who meet the prescribed
benchmark inter se seniority of the feeder grade shall
remain intact, eligibility for promotion will no doubt
Clerks (UDCs), and a separate cadre Unit in respect of those
two grades of CSCS exists for each Central Government Ministry. The
select list ... years of qualifying service, with no prescribed benchmark. LDCE is
governed by the CSCS (Upper Division Grade LDCE) Regulations, 1966
("LDCE Regulations"). LDCE
parties. The argument
here is that amongst those graded 'fit', by the relevant benchmark, in
their ACRs, no supersession is permissible. For this
