also
been contended in the said affidavit that since the benchmark grading prescribed by
the Government for promotion was "very good ... alongwith the other eligible CMO (OG). The Benchmark
grading prescribed by the Govt. for promotion was and is "Very Good". The
Petitioner could
given A3 grade, whereas, he
has received A1 grade from 1992 to 1998. In 2000, he got
A1 grade in his Annual Confidential Reports ... improper
gradings in his ACR by respondents no.3 and 4 who gave A2
grades which are below the benchmark remark of A1
required
Tribunal aggrieved by rejection of his representation against the
below-benchmark gradings in his Annual Confidential Report
(for short 'ACR') for the years ... 2009 because of the below-benchmark grading. The
respondent submitted several representations on 12/03/2009,
25/05/2009, 21/07/2009, 18/08/2009
overall grading obtained by each of them provided that each one of them has an overall grading equal to or better than the benchmark ... graded as 'Very Good' and officers graded as Very good would rank en bloc senior to those who are graded as 'Good
petitioner made representation that since the
below benchmark A.C.Rs. graded were not even conveyed to him
he was wrongly denied benefit from ... decided.
7. In the instant case, as noted hereinabove, the below
benchmark grading pertained to the year 1990-1991 and 1993-
1994 i.e. much
thereof,
a. Quash and set aside the adverse comments and below
benchmark grading in the APAR of the applicant for the
period from
Accordingly, we direct the respondents to
communicate the ACRs with below benchmark gradings for
which the applicants have been denied the 2nd financial
upgradation
Accordingly, we direct the respondents to
communicate the ACRs with below benchmark gradings for
which the applicants have been denied the 2nd financial
upgradation
Grade was "Very Good". Name of the respondent
did not appear in the promotion list as the ACR grading was
below the benchmark ... considered for promotion to
Senior Administrative Grade during April 2012 as the grading of
respondent was below the benchmark of "Very Good". Being
India. Further, it was held that the grading "good" which
was below the benchmark "very good" prescribed for
promotion, ought
