higher grade in the employees service and (b) in case the Reviewing / Accepting Authority has down graded the grading given by the Reporting Authority ... ratio that any grading which has adverse civil consequences for an employee should be considered as adverse remark/grading. If the grading given
into account the fact that the adverse remarks and the below benchmark gradings in the ACRs of the applicant were never communicated ... ACRs were not properly followed. The adverse remarks and below benchmark gradings in the ACRs were never communicated to the him. It is stated that
from the year 1984 to 1991, respondents have allowed the below benchmark grading to continue in his ACRs. His further submission is that by grading ... during the said period, they are not expected to give below benchmark grading to the applicant. The applicant submitted that his Efficiency Bar was cleared
officers who are graded as outstanding thereafter officers who are graded as very good and thereafter officers who are graded as good to the extent ... Grade-II which was the feeder grade for promotion to Superintendent (B/R) Grade-I. Thereafter, Superintendent Grade-I was the feeder grade for promotion
Direct respondents to reply against my pending representation pertaining to below benchmark grading in ACR of period 2005-06 and 2006-07.
(II) Direct respondent ... found that the grading given to him in the ACRs was below the benchmark, as a result of which, he has not been promoted
process of recording of ACRs, rejection of representations against below benchmark grading and their consideration by the DPC suffer from several infirmities. The grading ... directed the Departments concerned to convey all the below benchmark grading to the concerned person and to have his representation and in consideration thereof
year 2009. That as per rules an officer attaining at least four benchmark out of 5 ACRs is to be promoted in view ... took a conscious decision that an officer attaining at least four benchmark grading out of five ACRs. As prescribed by the Govt. of India
which the applicant represented against the below benchmark ACRs which were considered and the grading was upgraded to Very Good. It is further the case ... selected for the year 2010 IPS because of the said below benchmark grading ACRs on the basis of which the Selection Committee assessed
DOPT OM dated 10.4.1989. The instruction regarding communication of below benchmark gradings issued by DOPT is in respect of promotion only and has no bearing ... Review Screening Committee is to ignore the ACRs containing below-the benchmark gradings, if such ACRs stand in the way of the applicant being found
noted 3 ACRs of the applicant as below benchmark grading. As per the direction of the Tribunal in its order in OA No. 1116/2010 ... Average should be ignored.
7. We may advert to the below benchmark gradings in two other ACRs. In this context, we refer to the well
