direction to the respondents to expunge adverse
eniries/below benchmark grading of all 3 ACRs from 3004 to 2008
which had not been communicated ... review
Departmental Screening Committee Meeting by informing of adverse
remarks / belaw benchmark grading from the above period as expunged
while considering him for grant
communicated. The over all grading
was not required to be communicated even if such
grading was below the benchmark assessment for
promotion. It is only ... gradings
below the benchmark has become mandatory. Hence the
non-communication of below the benchmark grading of
Good cannot come to the rescue
Good
The perusal of the above grading in ACR indicates that the applicant has been graded below the benchmark for the years ... steep fall in the grading as compared to the grading of 2000-2001. We also note that grading of the ACR for the earlier years
natural justice. In fact grading Just
Adequate which is below the benchmark grading
Good and above the grading Poor which is in
fact adverse report ... stated earlier in the
present case the grading although it is below
the benchmark which may not strictly be stated
to be adverse. The grading
fitness in such future DPCs
contain final grading which are below the
benchmark for his next promotion, before such
ACRs are placed before ... applicant submitted that the appli-
cants were communicated the below benchmark grading in the
ACR in the year 2016 in view of the DoPT instructions
fitness in such future DPCs
contain final grading which are below the
benchmark for his next promotion, before such
ACRs are placed before ... applicant submitted that the appli-
cants were communicated the below benchmark grading in the
ACR in the year 2016 in view of the DoPT instructions
fitness in such future DPCs
contain final grading which are below the
benchmark for his next promotion, before such
ACRs are placed before ... applicant submitted that the appli-
cants were communicated the below benchmark grading in the
ACR in the year 2016 in view of the DoPT instructions
fitness in such future DPCs
contain final grading which are below the
benchmark for his next promotion, before such
ACRs are placed before ... applicant submitted that the appli-
cants were communicated the below benchmark grading in the
ACR in the year 2016 in view of the DoPT instructions
fitness in such future DPCs
contain final grading which are below the
benchmark for his next promotion, before such
ACRs are placed before ... applicant submitted that the appli-
cants were communicated the below benchmark grading in the
ACR in the year 2016 in view of the DoPT instructions
fitness in such future DPCs
contain final grading which are below the
benchmark for his next promotion, before such
ACRs are placed before ... applicant submitted that the appli-
cants were communicated the below benchmark grading in the
ACR in the year 2016 in view of the DoPT instructions
