unheeded. The Respondents communicated to the Applicant the ACRs with below benchmark grading by a letter dated 04.05.2010. The Applicant made two separate representations against ... below benchmark grading in the two ACRs on 16.05.2010 and 17.05.2010. These representations were rejected by the order dated 18.08.2010 by the Ministry of Defence
benchmark for
promotion is lower than the benchmark for granting
the benefits under MAU'S as mentioned in para 17
ibid, the benchmark ... benchmark for
promotion is lower than the benchmark for granting
the benefit under MACPS as mentioned in para 17
ibid, the benchmark for promotion shall
benchmark for
promotion is lower than the benchmark for granting
the benefits under MAU'S as mentioned in para 17
ibid, the benchmark ... benchmark for
promotion is lower than the benchmark for granting
the benefit under MACPS as mentioned in para 17
ibid, the benchmark for promotion shall
Very good i.e. at par or higher than
benchmark prescribed and below benchmark grading "Average" in
rest two ACRs for period ... communicated below benchmark grading. Thus, overall
grading even in these five ACRs for 2003-04 to 2007-08, was not
below benchmark.
5. In continuance
Band-4 with Grade Pay of Rs.8700/- including the Applicants for promotion to SAG Grade in Pay Band-4 with Grade ... should be considered as adverse remark/grading. If the grading given to an officer is Good and the benchmark is Very Good (this
direction to the respondents to expunge adverse
eniries/below benchmark grading of all 3 ACRs from 3004 to 2008
which had not been communicated ... review
Departmental Screening Committee Meeting by informing of adverse
remarks / belaw benchmark grading from the above period as expunged
while considering him for grant
below the prescribed benchmark of 'Very Good' for promotion. The ACRs, in which the below benchmark gradings were recorded, pertained to the year ... basis of the above mentioned below benchmark grading in his ACRs, which had not been communicated to him. It has been stated by the Applicant
grading. The respondent, without giving any individual replies to the applicant and to other similarly situated Doctors in whose cases the grading was below benchmark ... ignore the below benchmark gradings and to take into consideration the gradings which are commensurate with the benchmark by constituting a review DPC to reconsider
been filed questioning the letter dated 10.06.2011 communicating the below benchmark gradings of ACRs for the period ... furnished the ACRs containing the below benchmark remarks after a substantial delay, the said below benchmark gradings should be ignored while considering his case
which the benchmark grading is necessary. Those Grades
Pay are not that of promotional post on non-selection basis. It requires
benchmark grade as prescribed ... grade, he is entitled to
Grade Pay of Rs.7600/- and 8700/- respectively. As noticed supra, for
granting such a higher Grade Pay, the benchmark
