14200-18200 vide order dated 10.11.2000 and
was given Selection Grade with effect from 5.5.2000. Later, on 14.6.2004
he was posted as Joint Controller ... others [2] it
has been held that if a grading falling below the benchmark, has not been
communicated to the concerned employee
documents on the basis of which his conduct and diligence was graded as
‘average’. But no satisfactory response was received by the appellant
despite having ... given
grade ‘A+’ for the year 2001-2002, but only 1 mark was assigned. According
to the executive Instructions, the grade
matter of dispute, that the benchmark for promotion to
the post of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, under the prevailing DoPT
guidelines was “very good ... appellant was graded as “good” (for the years 1995-1996, 1996-1997 and
1998-1999), and in the remaining two he was graded as “very
benchmark. In the present case it is ‘good’.
E. In the field of Selection, the grading is marked.
F. Prepare the Select List
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ... vs Union Of India on 16 October, 2015
Author: Jagdish
