Band-4 with Grade Pay of Rs.8700/- including the Applicants for promotion to SAG Grade in Pay Band-4 with Grade ... should be considered as adverse remark/grading. If the grading given to an officer is Good and the benchmark is Very Good (this
grading. The respondent, without giving any individual replies to the applicant and to other similarly situated Doctors in whose cases the grading was below benchmark ... ignore the below benchmark gradings and to take into consideration the gradings which are commensurate with the benchmark by constituting a review DPC to reconsider
been filed questioning the letter dated 10.06.2011 communicating the below benchmark gradings of ACRs for the period ... furnished the ACRs containing the below benchmark remarks after a substantial delay, the said below benchmark gradings should be ignored while considering his case
wherein she had been graded 'Good', a grade
which was below the prescribed benchmark of 'Very Good'. Since there
were vacancies ... concerned for his response.
Opining that the effect of a below benchmark grading was prejudicial to
the interest of the appraise, inasmuch as right
periods in
question which were below benchmark have been directed to be ignored
because below benchmark ACR gradings were never conveyed to the
respondent ... concerned for his response.
Opining that the effect of a below benchmark grading was prejudicial to the
interest of the appraise, inasmuch as right
years 1998-99 and 1999-2000 he was given the below benchmark grading and the Reporting and the Reviewing Officers were Mr. James Thomas, Joint ... authority, the overall grading in the ACR have to be kept blank for appropriate re-grading by the DPCs. The existing grading shall be blocked
rejecting his representation dated 29.09.2009 for cancellation of his below benchmark grading in the ACR for the period 28.05.2007 to 31.03.2008 (hereinafter referred ... ACRs where he has been given below benchmark grading and the representations against which have been rejected by R-2.
3. The applicants case
instructions to her to
submit representation for upgradation of the below benchmark grading in
the ACRs to the second respondent. She produced copies ... other similarly affected officials to
represent against the adverse remarks/below benchmark grading in their
ACRs. The recommendation of the Scrutiny Committee will be considered
instructions on April 13, 2010 whereby
it was decided, even below benchmark grading in the ACRs prior to
the period 2008-2009 be communicated ... communicated to the petitioner. In any
case by communicating the below benchmark gradings in ACR, the
respondents have implemented the law laid down
that the benchmark was 3
'Very Good' and the respondent would not meet the benchmark as per the
ACR gradings above ... given by this
Tribunal to ignore the ACR, in which below benchmark grading
had been given, because both the reporting and reviewing
officers had retired
