that hence the prohibition contained in Section 4 of the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 would not get attracted to his case.
3. The suit ... construe the scope of Section 3(2) and Section 4 of the Benami Transaction Prohibition Act, 1988 in coming to the conclusion that the respondent
Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai 600 035.
3.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
(Benami Prohibition), Chennai,
Wanaparthy Block, VI Floor,
Aayakar Bhawan 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road ... Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai 600 035.
5.Addl., Commissioner of Income Tax,
(Benami Prohibition)
Wanaparthy Block, VI Floor,
Aayakar Bhawan 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai
judis
Page No.9 of 35
E.P..No.52 of 2021
Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 (the Benami Act ). As per Section ... person
claiming to be a real owner of a property against the benami. Since the
Award Holder claims that the Award Debtor is the real
Section
4(1) and (2) of the Prohibition of Benami Transaction Act, 1988 . Ex.P2- sale
deed, Ex.D5- auditor statement ... submitted by the learned counsel for
the first defendant that Benami transaction is not permissible and therefore, the
claim of the defendants
fact that the testatrix was only holding the property as a
benami for her brother, the Will came to be executed by the testatrix ... learned Single Judge also erred in observing that the
transaction being benami, no right can be claimed by the real owner in
view
fact that the testatrix was only holding the property as a
benami for her brother, the Will came to be executed by the testatrix ... learned Single Judge also erred in observing that the
transaction being benami, no right can be claimed by the real owner in
view
Chandra Prakash,
Rajan Chandrasekar and Anbarasan who are, in reality, the benamis of SPV. In
particular, it is alleged that Rajan Chandrasekar who owns ... were
arbitrarily extended only to enable the participation of the
companies of benamis of Thiru.S.P.Velumani (contract for
multi-level parking by Chennai
fact that the testatrix was only holding the property as a
benami for her brother, the Will came to be executed by the testatrix ... learned Single Judge also erred in observing that the
transaction being benami, no right can be claimed by the real owner in
view
learned Judge held that the presumption under Section 3(2) of the
Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act as it stood prior to the 2016
amendment, stood ... funds and the presumption under Section 3(2) of Benami Transaction
(Prohibition), Act as it stood prior to the amendment, stood rebutted
learned Judge held that the presumption under Section 3(2) of the
Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act as it stood prior to the 2016
amendment, stood ... funds and the presumption under Section 3(2) of Benami Transaction
(Prohibition), Act as it stood prior to the amendment, stood rebutted
