first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
