first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
alleges that
petitioner got the loan sanctioned in his name 'benami'.
40. Whether this plea is correct or not has to be examined ... needs to bear in mind the provisions of the
Prohibition of Benami Transactions Act,1988 . It was amended
issued by the Assistant
Commissioner of Income Tax being Initiating Officer, Benami
Transactions (Prohibition) Unit, Hyderabad under Section 24(1) of the
Prohibition of Benami ... Property Transactions Act, 1988 (briefly 'the
Benami Property Act ' hereinafter)
5. In the second batch of cases i.e., Group B, the challenge
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
first respondent under Section 24 (4) (a) (i) of
the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
6. By the aforesaid impugned order, first respondent ... thereby conclusively falling under Section 2
(9) (A) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act,
1988. Consequently, in exercise of powers under Sub-Section
