Mahipal Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 13 February, 2019
Mahipal Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 13 February, 2019
Equivalent
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 208 (1.20 seconds)Pahalwan vs State Of Haryana And Others on 7 December, 2022
years and his services have
been terminated on the ground that biometric impression did not match with
his biometric impression obtained at the time ... response thereto, he also sought an opportunity to give his
proper biometric impression, which had been denied to him. He, therefore,
submits that the petitioner
Sher Khan @ Sheru vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 28 February, 2023
disclosure of information,
including identity information or authentication records (except the core
biometric information) can only be made in accordance with the provisions of
Section ... Authority. to provide access to his identity information
excluding his core biometric information in such manner as may
be specified by regulations.
"29. Restriction
Rakesh Kumar vs Chandigarh Housing Board And Others on 23 September, 2024
Scheme, 2006
and he was issued Form Sr. No.30529 in the Biometric Survey Record. The
petitioner submitted his application dated 28.07.2016 for allotment ... That the name of the person should appear in the
Biometric Survey; and
(ii) The name must appear in the Voter List
Harjeet Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 5 August, 2024
entered the examination hall he was told to give
finger prints on biometric machine. However, on that day, the petitioner
was having fungal infection ... fingers and thumb due to which the
process of biometric could not be undertaken by him and therefore he
immediately made a written request
Sohan Lal vs Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation ... on 5 September, 2023
ORAL)
CM No. 5621-CWP- 2021
1. Allowed as prayed for.
2. Biometric report of Tata Consultancy (Annexure R-1) is taken
on record, subject ... permitted to join on the ground that on verification of Biometric
data, it has been found that his Biometric impression does not match with
Ravi Kumar And Another vs State Of Haryana And Others on 1 December, 2023
grievance of the petitioners is that on two earlier occasions, their
Biometric and facial recognition was requested for, which direction given by
the respondents ... once again for
the third time, the same request for biometric and facial recognition samples
was made and with the confidence that the petitioners have
Rajesh Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others on 30 July, 2018
Board so as to
compare fingerprints/thumb impressions/ any other form of
biometrics record, with the data base of a different organization.
Mr. Sinhal further ... common data base be not created by the State, to
match the biometrics of a candidate in a selection process, to
determine whether
Amit Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Another on 4 April, 2022
21169 of 2015. In the interregnum, petitioner kept on marking biometric
attendance and performing his duty as contractual employee.
AVIN KUMAR ... Complainant alleged that petitioner had marked his
biometric attendance in connivance with staff. An inquiry was ordered to be
conducted by the Forest Conservator Research
The Estate Officer Ut Chandigarh vs Tulsi And Anr on 1 August, 2016
made as under :-
(i) All persons whose names appear in the
biometric survey and voter list as on
1.1.2006 shall be eligible for allotment ... read together, would mean that
all persons whose names appear in the biometric survey and voter
list as on 1.1.2006 shall be eligible for allotment