Mr. Virendra Khanna vs State Of Karnataka By: on 12 March, 2021
Mr. Virendra Khanna vs State Of Karnataka By: on 12 March, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 131 (1.06 seconds)P.Gopalakrishnan Alias Dileep vs State Of Kerala on 29 January, 2022
Right to Privacy and held:-
"Would providing a password, passcode or Biometrics amount to self-
incrimination or testimonial compulsion?
As regards the contention that ... given by the accused by providing the said
password, passcode or biometrics by which the document is being
accessed by the Investigating officer
Byju B.R vs State Of Kerala on 29 January, 2022
Right to Privacy and held:-
"Would providing a password, passcode or Biometrics amount to self-
incrimination or testimonial compulsion?
As regards the contention that ... given by the accused by providing the said
password, passcode or biometrics by which the document is being
accessed by the Investigating officer
Krishnaprasad.R vs State Of Kerala on 29 January, 2022
Right to Privacy and held:-
"Would providing a password, passcode or Biometrics amount to self-
incrimination or testimonial compulsion?
As regards the contention that ... given by the accused by providing the said
password, passcode or biometrics by which the document is being
accessed by the Investigating officer
Guduru Venkata Naga Sekhar Reddy, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 1 December, 2021
colluded with private persons, entered into the web-land
through biometric authentication of A1 on 19.3.2021 by uploading
proceedings Rc.B169/2021 dated ... said offer made, A1 entered into
the web-land through her biometric authentication on 19.3.2021
by uploading proceedings dated 15.02.2021 approved by A2
reduced
John Presenna Simeon vs The State Of Telangana on 28 March, 2022
employees
of M/s. Next Biometric Solutions India Private
Limited, directed the Investigating Officer that the
petitioners therein shall not be arrested and further
directed ... Investigating Officer not to harass the
employees of M/s. Next Biometric Solutions India
Private Limited.
3. The petitioner is also an employee of Next
State vs Raju Ram on 19 September, 2022
then the operator Manish Kumar informed him that the
biometric of said person is not matching with the date base.
FIR No. 184/2009 ... footage. He denied the suggestion that the quarrel took
place between the biometric operator and the accused Pukh
Raj.
6. PW 2 / ASI Prahlad
State vs . 1. Sri Krishan@ Lala, on 10 July, 2017
defence accused examined six witnesses.
DW1 Dr. Deepak Mittal who proved biometric attendance
sheet w.e.f 16.9.12 till 15.10.12 of accused Jai Prakash ... stated that as per record accused Jai Prakash put his
biometric attendance on 28.9.12 in the morning at 8.53 a.m and outgoing
attendance
State vs . Praveen on 27 January, 2020
going on and his duty was to
conduct finger print at the biometric machine. At about 12 pm after
conducting first biometric finger print ... second batch he took the
candidate to second and last biometric and the admit card of the candidate
were distributed. He started the matching
Smt. Thota Padmavathi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 25 April, 2023
alive,
real or imaginary, by providing any false
demographic information or biometric information,
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term
which may extend ... Penalty for impersonation of Aadhar number
holder by changing demographic information or
biometric information:- Whoever, with the intention
of causing harm or mischief