dated 17.11.2017 on the
ground that it ought to have been black listed from a date
prior thereto.
1 of 6
::: Downloaded ... would be afforded a personal hearing and a
decision regarding black listing of respondent No.7 would be
taken before the next date of hearing
negative, there should be no
interference under Article 226. Cases involving black-listing or
imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer/contractor or
distribution
negative, there should be no
interference under Article 226. Cases involving black-listing or
imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer/contractor or
distribution
negative, there should be no
interference under Article 226. Cases involving black-listing or
imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer/contractor or
distribution
negative, there should be no
interference under Article 226. Cases involving black-listing or
imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer/contractor or
distribution
negative, there should be no
interference under Article 226. Cases involving black-listing or
imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer/contractor or
distribution
negative, there should be no
interference under Article 226. Cases involving black-listing or
imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer/contractor or
distribution
negative, there should be no
interference under Article 226. Cases involving black-listing or
imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer/contractor or
distribution
negative, there should be no
interference under Article 226. Cases involving black-listing or
imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer/contractor or
distribution
negative, there should be no
interference under Article 226. Cases involving black-listing or
imposition of penal consequences on a tenderer/contractor or
distribution
