renewal
of license under Bombay Cinema (Regulations) Act, 1953 and Bombay
Cinema Rules, 1954. The petitioners have fulfilled all the requisite
conditions which are required ... respondent No.1
are beyond the scope of Bombay Cinema Regulations Act, 1953 and
Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954. It is submitted that impugned order
existing cinema theatre is an "aggrieved person" within
the meaning of s. 8A of the Bombay Cinema Rules. 1954
entitling him to invoke ... objection certificate" under rule 6 of the
Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954.
Damnum sine injuria-Principle of.
Under the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954, the District
Bombay Cinema (Regulation) Act 1953 and Bombay Cinema Rules
1954-Licence for exhibiting films and licence for selling
tickets renewable from year to year-Contravention ... respondent carried on the business of exhibiting cinema
to graphic pictures a Ahmedabad. Under the Bombay Cinema
Rules 1954 framed under the Bombay Cinema (Regulation
Kumar , , which was a case under the Bombay Cinemas Regulation Act, 1953 and the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954. Taking note of the pronouncements of this ... already noted, which arose under the Bombay Cinemas Regulation Act, 1953 and the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954. The facts of the case, as we could
cinema theatre in the town, under Rule 6 of the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954, framed under the Bombay Cinemas Regulation Act, 1953 . Rule ... case before us is an a fortiori case. In the Bombay' Cinema Rules, with which the Supreme Court was concerned, there was a provision
Kumar , which as a case under the Bombay Cinemas Regulation Act, 1953 and the Bombay Cinema Rules 1954. Taking note of the pronouncements of this ... already noted, which arose under the Bombay Cinemas Regulation Act, 1953 and the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954. The facts of the case, as we could
provisions of the Bombay Cinema (Regulation) Act, 1953 ('the Act' for short) and the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954 ('the Rules ... powers to make such rules. In exercise of rule making powers, the State Government has made rules called the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954. Rule
reason for this liberalisation of the rule in the case of a
taxpayer of a municipality is that his interest in the application ... Roshan Kumar :
), this Court noticed that the Bombay Cinematograph Act,
1918 and the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954 made under that Act, recognised a
special interest
vide : Varadarajan v. Salem Municipality .
. The reason for this liberalisation of the rule in the case of a tax payer of a municipality is that ... Roshan Kumar
, this Court noticed that the Bombay Cinematograph Act . 1918 and the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954 made under that Act, recognised a special interest
following questions for its determina-
tion:-
"Whether the proprietor of a cinema theater
holding a licence for exhibiting cinematograph
films, is entitled to invoke ... Objection Certificate', granted under Rule
6 of the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954 (for short,
the Rules) by the District Magistrate in
favour
