trial Court came to the conclusion that the defendant was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of this property from Martand and dismissed ... monies, and that the defendant not being a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, was not protected under Section 64 , Trusts
cannot be bona fide and Jajodia having not led any evidence of
due diligence, cannot be said to be a bona fide purchaser;
(oo) that ... would mean that the purchaser willfully
refrained from making the enquiry and such purchaser
cannot establish his bona fides as a purchaser in good
faith
consideration and they were bona fide purchasers for consideration and without notice. It was further pleaded that agreement executed by defendant No. 1 in favour ... alleged?
4. Whether defendant Nos. 2 and 3 are bona fide purchasers for consideration and without notice of the agreement ?
5. Relief.
5. Both
cannot be bona fide and Jajodia having not led any evidence of
due diligence, cannot be said to be a bona fide purchaser;
(oo) that ... would mean that the purchaser willfully
refrained from making the enquiry and such purchaser
cannot establish his bona fides as a purchaser in good
faith
cases where the purchaser in a Court sale is a bona fide purchaser for valuable consideration limitation for an application to set aside a sale ... application to set aside the sale though decree-holder is a bona fide purchaser for value and it is to protect persons like Judgment-debtors
cannot be bona fide and Jajodia having not led any evidence of
due diligence, cannot be said to be a bona fide purchaser;
(oo) that ... would mean that the purchaser willfully
refrained from making the enquiry and such purchaser
cannot establish his bona fides as a purchaser in good
faith
cannot be bona fide and Jajodia having not led any evidence of
due diligence, cannot be said to be a bona fide purchaser;
(oo) that ... would mean that the purchaser willfully
refrained from making the enquiry and such purchaser
cannot establish his bona fides as a purchaser in good
faith
defendants and
therefore, it cannot be said that they are the bonafide
purchasers for valuable consideration. The trial Court was
justified in decreeing the suit ... part of the contract?
(3) Whether defendants 3 and 4 are bona fide
purchasers for valuable consideration without
notice of the agreement of sale
further pleaded that in any event, defendant No. 1 being a bona fide purchaser for valuable consideration from an ostensible owner not having notice ... Transfer of Property Act, he being bona fide purchaser for value without notice.
So far as the first submission is concerned, it proceeds
proceeded exparte. The contesting defendant claimed that he was bona fide purchaser for consideration and therefore, protected under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property ... registered sale-deed dated 31.7.1986 and therefore, defendants claimed to be bona fide purchasers for consideration. The other averments made in the plaint were also
