respondent No. 5 was not in the
BPL category since inception and the BPL card has wrongly been issued in
the name of the father ... Policy framers is to extend the benefit of BPL to the genuine BPL Card
holders and not to the persons who obtained such cards
entitled for grant of 10 marks towards the BPL for
the reasons that the BPL card of the writ petitioner was found to be
suspicious ... demonstrate that how her family card has been manipulated.
The manipulation in the family card, it makes the family card a suspicious
document. Therefore, once
appeal before
the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hata for cancellation of BPL card issued
in favour of respondent No.4 herein and also of one Pooja ... Divisional Magistrate vide order dated
16.11.2016 (Annexure-P/4) cancelled the BPL card, but vide order dated
29.11.2016 (Annexure-P/5), their names have again
BPL list is the minimum standard
of financial status for giving BPL facilities. As per the criteria
fixed for issuance of BPL card, only ... BPL list.
However, the petitioner's father got 18 marks, hence he was
not entitled for the BPL card and passed an order
Tomar
filed an objection on 20/02/2014 in respect of BPL card of
respondent No.6 before the Pariyojna Adhikari. Pariyojna
Adhikari rejeted ... 2015
Ration Card and APL card holders in which the name of
husband of the petitioner has not been shown in the BPL
card
objection for
non-grant of 10 marks as holder of BPL card. Considering her
objections, 10 marks were added to her total and with ... cancelled on 10.02.2016 for the reasons that she
obtained the BPL card on 15.10.2014 after the final date for
submitting the applications. Since respondent
candidature. The collector mainly interfered on the
ground that the BPL card filed by the petitioner relates to Village
Akori, whereas petitioner was resident ... entitled to get 10 marks of BPL status irrespective of place
of residence mentioned in the BPL card. In addition, it is
contended that specific
order on the
ground that the petitioner is not a valid BPL Card holder, therefore, the
benefit of 10 marks being granted ... lieu of her BPL Card should be
withdrawn as she is not entitled for the same and in case such marks are
being withdrawn then
would, on the merit of the
matter, contend that the BPL card was secured by the wife without
informing the complainant. The moment the complainant ... came to
know, the BPL card is cancelled long before the transaction. He
14
would contend that if in the event of non-payment
would, on the merit of the
matter, contend that the BPL card was secured by the wife without
informing the complainant. The moment the complainant ... came to
know, the BPL card is cancelled long before the transaction. He
14
would contend that if in the event of non-payment
