opinion of the doctor the deceased-died due to brain damage caused by injury No. 1, as described at page 2 of the post mortem ... final opinion given by this witness, the deceased died due to brain damage caused by injury No. 1, as described in page
such injury, the parietal bone was reduced into pieces and the brain was damaged and the brain matter had come out. According to the doctor
Sitaram, performed operation on the deceased since it was suspected that brain was damaged. According to Dr. Sitaram, during surgery, the left temporal lobe
having been treated for a disease which had led to damage of the brain and it was after his return back to his home
meninges. Injury No. 2 showed cut of parietal bone, meninges and brain matter. Depth of the wound was 4 cm. Injury No. 3 showed ... nature.
9. Medical evidence reveals extensive damage to the parietal, frontal, occipital bones, meaninges and brain matter underneath injury NoS. 1, 2 and 3. Thus
having been treated for a disease which had led to damage of the brain and it was after his return back to his home
other internal organs are normal in shape and size. Spinal Cord intact. Brain 1500 gms. C. S. Pale. Post-mortem was concluded ... punctured wounds and multiple injuries and fractures of major bones and great damage to major blood vessels about 28 to 30 hours prior to autopsy
caused by shock and haemorrhage due to the injury to the
brain which was sufficient to. cause death in the ordinary
course of nature. During ... incorrect to
suggest that the injury to the brain was only likely to
cause death and not sufficient to cause death." Indeed, the
death
H.K. Makwana vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 8 April, 1994
Equivalent citations
Deoraj Deju Suvarna And Etc. vs State Of Maharashtra on 19 April, 1994
Equivalent citations
