counterfeit goods bearing the suit trademarks, the defendants
also offered for sale and supply of counterfeit goods of other luxury
brands through their website ... seasoned infringers and
counterfeiters with a regular supply of counterfeit goods. Many of the
right holders of these brands have instituted proceedings against the
defendants
customer does notfall prey or victim to counterfeit or spuriousdrugs.(2) That though misbranding would include branding in such a manner which is contrary
engaged in
the business of selling and manufacturing various counterfeit
products of Nike brand.
24. In the case of Hero Honda Motors
result that there was not only loss of profit, but the brand equity of the plaintiff was affected on account of inferior quality ... poor quality in finish and packaging. Thus, the defendant was counterfeiting the product of the plaintiff and selling the goods as that of the plaintiff
result that there was not only loss of profit, but the brand equity of the plaintiff was affected on account of inferior quality ... poor quality in finish and packaging. Thus, the defendant was counterfeiting the product of the plaintiff and selling the goods as that of the plaintiff
Plaintiff has collaborated and
partnered with various prominent and high-profile
global brands to launch its limited edition
collaborative merchandise and other products such
Signature ... several renowned
designers, artists, photographers and musicians,
who have consistently endorsed the brand. The
reputation and goodwill of the goods of the Plaintiff
under
identical or deceptively similar to the
Plaintiffs'
products under the brand name/mark 'TORQ-GARD',
in any manner whatsoever including third party ... That the
deponent was not aware that the said product was
counterfeit product. The Deponent states that the
CS (COMM) 498/2021 Page
number of paris of shoes constituting the Third Batch of Counterfeit Goods. Counsel for the plaintiff had eventually accepted the figure of 13,596 (which ... long term basis in order to promote the plaintiff's brand and have (sic) consequently established a great distinctive character. This contention is also
result that there was not only loss of profit, but the brand equity of the plaintiff was affected on account of inferior quality ... poor quality in finish and packaging. Thus, the defendant was counterfeiting the product of the plaintiff and selling the goods as that of the plaintiff
shop and godown. He has chosen to avoid any inkling about
the brand/trademark and class of goods in which he has been dealing ... shop and godown.
His version of denying dealing in counterfeit goods is diametrically opposite to the
report of Ld. Local Commissioner. The fact that defendant
