Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Travancore v. Commissioner of Income Tax , (1986) 2 SCC 11 and Cape Brandy Syndicate v. IRC, (1921) 1 KB 64, summed

Travancore v. Commissioner of Income Tax , (1986) 2 SCC 11 and Cape Brandy Syndicate v. IRC, (1921) 1 KB 64, summed

Travancore v. Commissioner of Income Tax , (1986) 2 SCC 11 and Cape Brandy Syndicate v. IRC, (1921) 1 KB 64, summed

implied. One can only look fairly at the language used". [Cape Brandy Syndicate v. IRC, (1921) 1 KB 64, p.71 (ROWLATT, J.)]. Relying

Glanbia Performance Nutrition India ... vs Mundra on 1 September, 2023 Customs, Excise & Service Tax

implied and there is no room for any intendment. (See: Cape Brandy Syndicate Vs. Inland Revenue Commissioners [1921] 1 K.B. 64 and Ajmera Housing

other fats, sugar, milk, cream, eggs, cocoa, chocolate, coffee, honey, fruit, liqueurs, brandy, albumen, cheese, meat, fish, flavourings, yeast or other leavening agents. (11) Certain

Ajmera Housing Corpn. [(2010) 8 SCC 739] o Cape Brandy Syndicate v. IRC [(1921) 1 KB 64]  The appellant are entering into an agreement with

implied and there is no room for any intendment. [See: Cape Brandy Syndicate v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, 6 E/87542/2022

implied and there is no room for any intendment. [See: Cape Brandy Syndicate v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, [1921] 1 K.B. 64 and Ajmera Housing