covenant, the ratio in Central Inland Water
Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly reported in (1986) 3 SCC 156
was applied where Court observed ... basis of the above ratio in the Brojo Nath Ganguly (supra), this
Court while upholding the entitlements of Usha Rani Goswami and 5 others
apex court in Central Inland Water Transport
Corporation vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly, reported in (1986) 3
SCC 156, has held as under :
"As seen ... very much the same."
It has been further observed in Brojo Nath Ganguly
(supra) that, the court will not enforce and will, when called
Court in
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited
and another Vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly and another 5 have
held that an instrumentality of the State ... considered and relied
upon the principle of law laid down in Brojo Nath Ganguly
(supra) and held that concept of unequal bargaining power
rendered in Central Inland Water Transport
Corporation Limited & Anr. vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly and
Anr., (1986) 3 SCC 156 as well as of Division ... Court in Central Inland
Water Transport Corporation Limited & Anr. vs. Brojo Nath
Ganguly and Anr. (supra) has observed as under:
"This principle
Central Inland Water
Transport Corporation Limited and Another v. Brojo Nath
Ganguly and Another), a condition in the appointment letter that
the Corporation could terminate
observations in Central
Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. & Anr. vs. Brojo Nath
Ganguly & Anr.6 on the issue of consent of the agreement
Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings vs Unitech Limited on 11 April, 2017
Author: Vibhu Bakhru
Central Inlald Water vs. Brojo Nath
Ganguly reported in 1986 (2) SCC 156.
69. It was also further contended that the
respondents are not seeking
this Court in Central Inland Water
Transport Corpn. Ltd. v. Brojo Nath
Ganguly
celebrated
decision of Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs.
Brojo Nath Ganguly and another , (1986) 3 SCC 156, which reads
as under
