Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.42 seconds)

Abhay Kumar Verma vs M/O Textiles on 8 July, 2024

documents verification. During documents verification, it was observed that on OMR sheet bubble no. 82, 94 and 99 were erased by the applicant, which ... written the roll number numerically correct as 2141305179 but during shading of bubble he mistakenly shaded '0' in place
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prabhakar Kumar Deo vs M/O Railways on 31 January, 2025

record that by that time no such plea regarding erasing of bubbled answer was raised by the respondents. Had the applicant erased the bubbled answer ... sheet would not have been evaluated. Plea of erasing of bubbled answer was taken for the first time in the Contempt Petition. This fact
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ratnakar Verma vs North Central Railway on 25 November, 2025

found that the applicant had erased and altered the marked responses in bubbles No. 77. It reflects from the OMR Sheet of the applicant, which ... explicitly prohibit any changes to marked answers. Once a bubble is darkened, no alteration is permitted. These instructions also state that non-compliance would render
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harishchand vs North Central Railway on 9 October, 2025

explicitly prohibit any changes to marked PUNIT answers. Once a bubble is darkened, no alteration is permitted. These KUMAR MISHRA instructions also state that ... ीं की जाएगी 8. The act of tampering with or erasing marked bubbles on the OMR sheet is a serious violation, as it undermines
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next