under No. 383562 in class 30 in respect of confectionery, chewing and bubble gum under the provisions of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter ... manufacturing and marketing a wide range of sweets and confectioneries including bubble gum. The applicant's predecessors were carrying on business for a long
dismissed.
3. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of chewing gum/bubble gum and were availing the benefit of CENVAT Credit in respect ... inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of bubble gum including packing material. The appellants availed Credit on the goods known as Boomer
appeal are, in brief, as under:
1.1 The appellant are manufacturers of bubble gum chargeable to Central Excise Duty. The period of dispute in this ... 2005 to 28/2/2006. There is no dispute that bubble gum contains sugar and is classifiable under heading 1704 of the Central Excise Tariff
appeal filed by M/s. Joyco India Pvt. Ltd. is whether the Bubble Gum manufactured by them is classifiable under sub-heading 1704.90 as claimed ... Shri S. Madhavan, learned Chartered Accountant, submitted that the appellants manufacture Bubble Gum which was classified by them under sub-heading 1704.90; that the period
sheet
provided to the applicant, he was subjected to bubble set
'C' in the question paper but inadvertently, he bubbled ... instead of 'C' while bubbling the OMR sheet. However, he
has transcribed according to question paper set 'C' in the
relevant
qualified on 24.6.2020 for the reason that he did not bubble
the Hall Ticket number in paper IV of the examination on the Optical Mark ... though the hall ticket number was written correctly it was not properly
bubbled in the corresponding portion of the OMR sheet in respect of paper
point of time during the surgery was there any air bubbles introduced into the cavity. The procedure, was completed uneventfully and to complete satisfaction ... assistant manning the irrigating fluid to check as he noticed air bubbles in the uterine cavity. At the same time the anesthetist found that
sheet as the applicant filled his Control No.
109565 while darkening the bubbles at the given space instead of
1095655. For this omission/commission ... result processing
which was done by matching scanned OMR data [darkened
bubbles] with original base records (as captured during the time
of application/admit card
office, it had to be
rejected, as he had not bubbled the columns 13 (1) B.A. (Hon.) in MIL
concerned (2) B.A. with ... 2015
was correct, as the candidate had not bubbled the requisite/important
columns meant for the Post Code 14/13, and as the applicant
Bubbly Singh vs 1. Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. ... on 1 May, 2013
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
U.T., CHANDIGARH
Complaint Case ... Date of Institution
:
18.02.2013
Date of Decision
:
01.05.2013
1.
Bubbly Singh wife of Sr. Madanjit Singh R/o
Schkoon, Kanda Road, Dharampur.
2.
Sr. Madanjit
