Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 76 (0.80 seconds)

M/S Bubble Export vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance on 3 May, 2016

Bubble Export vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance on 3 May, 2016 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. Consumer Complaint ... Date of institution : 24.02.2016 Date of decision : 03.05.2016 M/s Bubble Export D-140, Focal Point, Jalandhar, through its Partner Taranbir Singh, aged 37 years
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Kumar vs M/O Railways on 1 September, 2016

sheet not correctly. He entered the wrong booklet no. by darkening the bubbles in the given place as 423043 instead of 4230043. As the whole ... contended by the applicant that he had correctly mentioned and bubbled his roll number/control number and booklet number in the OMR sheet
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs M/O Railways on 9 August, 2016

prescribed column correctly, and had admittedly left one of the bubbles on OMR Sheet blank. Therefore, the OMR evaluation software could not accept/identify ... applicant is capable of filling up more than 99% of the bubbles in the OMR Sheet, and was able to complete his question paper
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms Santosh vs Govt. Of Nctd on 19 January, 2016

this office which was considered and rejected as the Applicant had not bubbled the column 13(1) B.A. (Hon.) in MIL concerned (3) Additional ... respect of the applications for the examination. The candidates are required to bubble the relevant Columns correctly as per the instructions issued vide the Advertisement
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next