Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Sri Krishnamurthy N vs State Of Karnataka on 5 December, 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH

terms to be one-sided and heavily tilted in favour of the Builder. He returned the document vide letter dated 30.08.2014, requesting amendments ... Counsel for the Respondent has further argued that where the Builder charges 24% p.a. interest from Allottees in case of delay in payment

terms to be one-sided and heavily tilted in favour of the Builder. He returned the document vide letter dated 30.08.2014, requesting amendments ... Counsel for the Respondent has further argued that where the Builder charges 24% p.a. interest from Allottees in case of delay in payment

maintenance charges for July and August 2023 along with interest @9% per annum, to pay compensation of 50,000/- ( 35,000/- by the builder-appellants ... just because they signed such a document. 16. As for maintenance charges, builders can demand them only after giving habitable possession meaning the buyer

builder 605921 and demand letter 1 Rs. 15.12.2014 Cheque SBI passbook, 9,98,000 issued vide email received cheque no from the builder, 605925 proof ... issued vide email received registration cheque no from the builder Charges 605924 and demand letter 1 Total

builder. 4. Before arranging the builder to put up construction in joint venture the plaintiff assured to pay Rs.5,00,000/- towards service charges ... builder. 16. Before arranging the builder to put up construction in joint venture the plaintiff assured to pay Rs.5,00,000/- towards service charges

plaintiffs with ulterior motive stopped paying the maintenance, freehold charges and other charges, due to the reason, electricity was not provided. The electricity ... been regularly requesting the Plaintiffs to pay maintenance and freehold charges, but these charges had not been paid by the Plaintiffs. 6.13 It is denied

entered into agreement with the builder that for the first year, he would pay to builder the maintenance charges @ Rs. 2.5 and thereafter, he would ... such charges either to the builder or to any other maintenance agency appointed by the builder. Such charges were never demanded CS (COMM

entered into agreement with the builder that for the first year, he would pay to builder the maintenance charges @ Rs. 2.5 and thereafter, he would ... such charges either to the builder or to any other maintenance agency appointed by the builder. Such charges were never demanded from plaintiff

entered into agreement with the builder that for the first year, he would pay to builder the maintenance charges @ Rs. 2.5 and thereafter, he would ... such charges either to the builder or to any other maintenance agency appointed by the builder. Such charges were never demanded from plaintiff