elaborated in Associate Builders v. Delhi Development
Authority1 , as contractual provisions had been interpreted
in a way no fair-minded and reasonable person would ... Indian law” as explained in
paras 18 and 27 of Associate Builders [Associate
Builders
situation where a flat buyer,
despite the failure of the builder to offer possession within the time stipulated,
11
would be practically left remediless ... compensation payable to him, even though the money was
utilized by the builder. Even the principal amount would be refunded at an
uncertain future point
judgments in support of his submissions:
MMTC Limited v. Vedanta Limited1 , Associate Builders v.
Delhi Development Authority2 , State of Jharkhand and
Others v. HSS Integrated ... considered various judgments of this Court
in the case of Associate Builders (supra).
38. Another bench of this Court, again to which
Chintels India Ltd. vs Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd. on 11 February, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 1014, AIRONLINE 2021 SC 57
Author ... CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4028 OF 2020
CHINTELS INDIA LTD. …Appellant
Versus
BHAYANA BUILDERS PVT. LTD. …Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.F. Nariman, J.
1. This appeal arises
patent illegality”. What would constitute “patent
illegality” has been elaborated in Associate Builders v. Delhi
Development Authority8 , where “patent illegality” that broadly falls
under ... Indian law” as explained in paras 18
and 27 of Associate Builders [Associate Builders
Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt ... vs M/S Maharia Raj Joint Venture & Ors on 5 March, 2021
Author: J.R. Midha
Bench ... 2021, 193/2020
9 M/S BHANDARI ENGINEERS &
BUILDERS PVT LTD ..... Decree Holder
Through: Mr. S.S. Jauhar, Advocate.
Versus
M/S MAHARIA
judgment of a two-judge Bench of this Court
in Daddy’s Builders Private Limited v. Manisha Bhargava 8. The decision was
rendered ... costs. Referring to the above order, this Court in Daddy’s Builders (supra)
observed that ultimately it was left to the concerned fora to accept
Verified
for the benefit of more than about 1000 purchasers, the builder has
Digitally signed by
Jayant Kumar Arora
Date ... Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure .
4. Though the builder who is the appellant herein objected to the
application under Section
RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. The appellant (hereafter called “Laureate” or “the builder”) is aggrieved by
an order of the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission ... hereafter “the purchaser”) had sought, through his
complaint a direction against the builder, for refund of the consideration amount of
₹1,93,70,883/- received
Krishnamurthy vs M/S Bharath Hi Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. on 14 December, 2021
Author: D.Y. Chandrachud
Bench: D.Y. Chandrachud , Surya Kant , Vikram ... Krishnamurthy & Ors. …. Appellants
Versus
M/s Bharath Hi Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. …. Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J
1 Admit.
2 The present
