buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
buildings upto to 60 feet. The revised building plan was rejected. However, developer/ builder continued to construct building. The Executive Engineer thereupon issued ... Supreme Court. It was held that even the buyers cannot claim regularisation of illegal construction. The writ petition was dismissed with a direction
