wives who had done it. The
advocate also tore Sonam's burqa. There was also some violence against her.
The contention before
counsel for the
appellant was that there was no recovery of the burqa which the
prosecutrix had claimed to have been wearing at the time ... learned counsel also as non recovery of
knife and the burqa cannot throw any doubt on the wholly trustworthy
testimony of the prosecutrix
while taking her to the court,
she was forced to wear Burqa and threatened not to disclose the matter to
anybody and due to fear ... persons took her to Bijnaur Court where she was forced to wear Burqa and
threatened not to disclose the matter to anybody. She was forced
meantime, both the said ladies removed their veil (burqa) and suddenly Furkhan,
Zaved, Naeem Alam, Saifuddin and Naeem (labour) entered into his said house
anywhere during that period as the accused had made
her to wear burqa. After seeing photographs Mark
home and two are teachers in school and do not wear
burqa when they go out but where chaddar. Thus, clearly, the
ladies