Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 164 (6.15 seconds)

M/S Kaizen Digital Cable vs M/S. Siti Cable Network Limited on 9 December, 2021

establishment of Cable Networks, Retransmission of various communication signals and supply of software to various Distribution companies/local cable operators through its networks established ... establishment of Cable Networks, Retransmission of various communication signals and supply of software to various Distribution companies/local cable operators through its networks established
Bangalore District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Monu Panwar vs State on 24 March, 2023

cross-examination of PW-1 is looked into, then the Cable Operator is alleged to have told the names of both the accused ... statement of any Cable Operator has been recorded by the IO and submitted that the complainant in her complaint Ex.PW1/A has nowhere
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahendra vs The on 14 May, 2010

managing the same; that cable connection from control room of Shiv World Vision was given to sub-cable operator accused Hemantsinh @ Tino Manubhai Chavda ... were issued by Mamlatdar to these sub-cable operators as they did not pay entertainment tax, therefore, there was telephonic talk between deceased Hemendrasinh @ Harry
Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A L Dave - Full Document

M.R.Ramesh vs Mahadeva on 11 November, 2019

accused along with Puttaswamy, who is the T.V.Cable operator in the area of Kamalanagar, Bengaluru, who is well known to both of them ... domestic needs. The complainant has further averred that, The T.V.Cable operator - Puttaswamy also convinced the complainant that, the accused already started the house
Bangalore District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi vs . 1 Krishan Sharawat, on 3 August, 2013

collect the due and payable entertainment tax from the cable operators and he was duty-bound to visit the offices of such defaulters to collect ... insisted complainant to leave such demanded amount with some other cable operator but complainant refused to accept such proposal by saying that he would
Delhi District Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Rajbir @ Wazir on 12 August, 2008

their common intention removed goods from the shops of two cable operators and set them on fire with a view to cause mischief ... partner of Raj Kumar Gupta in Laxmi Cables; Naresh, an employee of the said cable operator; Smt. Gudiya, wife of Ram Niwas (the cable operator
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramesh @ Guddu vs State on 10 September, 2018

their testimonies are further corroborated by the depositions of Rajender Kumar, Cable Operator (PW1) and another tenant on the second floor of the said premises ... testimony of Rajender Kumar (PW1), who is working under the Cable Operator at Ishika Cable Network, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi. He identified the person whose
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - V Goel - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next