candidates,
who fulfilled all the essential advertised qualifications and experience, were
called for interview on 02.08.2006 including the present petitioner, and in
fact, the petitioner ... said post.
It was further alleged that, the candidates were called for interview on
the basis of the advertised essential qualification and experience
channel for direct recruitment by competitive examination. Petitioners
were, however, not called for interview, and the Assistant Engineers
(Mechanical/Electrical) were selected only through ... followed, Rule 18 provides:
18. The commission may at its discretion call for interview a limited
number of candidates either in case of promotion
reasonably expected by the petitioner that only 11 candidates would be
called for interview. However, 20 more ineligible candidates were later included
in the list ... participation in the interview, the petitioner was surprised
to see that a total of 31 candidates were being interviewed. Since the interview
was held
written examination. She is,
therefore, not entitled to be called for interview. She has not been
called to the interview.
2
The contention on behalf ... that five times the number of
vacancies should be called for interview is misplaced. Rule (6) of the
Recruitment Rules reads thus
categories could have
been called for interview. The inclusion of reserved category candidates not
only constitutes violation of Rule 12(4) of the 2016 Rules ... simple reason that a
candidate who has not received interview call for lack of vacancy, could have
got a berth in the merit list
categories could have
been called for interview. The inclusion of reserved category candidates not
only constitutes violation of Rule 12(4) of the 2016 Rules ... simple reason that a
candidate who has not received interview call for lack of vacancy, could have
got a berth in the merit list
categories could have
been called for interview. The inclusion of reserved category candidates not
only constitutes violation of Rule 12(4) of the 2016 Rules ... simple reason that a
candidate who has not received interview call for lack of vacancy, could have
got a berth in the merit list
categories could have
been called for interview. The inclusion of reserved category candidates not
only constitutes violation of Rule 12(4) of the 2016 Rules ... simple reason that a
candidate who has not received interview call for lack of vacancy, could have
got a berth in the merit list
categories could have
been called for interview. The inclusion of reserved category candidates not
only constitutes violation of Rule 12(4) of the 2016 Rules ... simple reason that a
candidate who has not received interview call for lack of vacancy, could have
got a berth in the merit list
categories could have
been called for interview. The inclusion of reserved category candidates not
only constitutes violation of Rule 12(4) of the 2016 Rules ... simple reason that a
candidate who has not received interview call for lack of vacancy, could have
got a berth in the merit list
