petitioner No. 2 was residing in Canada and she was married. She obtained a decree for divorce from Supreme Court of British Columbia ... since the divorce decree has not been granted under the Act of 1955 but has been granted under the Divorce Act Canada and has been
Ontario in Canada and the offence, if any, was committed there,
but the FIR was lodged at Jalandhar only after the divorce petition
has been
Jaipur
(302004) At Present Address 18 Yonge Street, Unit 2306,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada - M5E1Z8
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Shri Rajeev Surana
For Respondent(s) : Shri ... that both the parties have entered into a MoU
dated 8.5.2018 seeking divorce by mutual consent and therefore
they filed application for seeking divorce
Surendra Bhatia vs Poonam Bhatia And Ors. on 22 November, 2005
Equivalent citations: AIR2006RAJ128, I
Anand Kumar Jain And Anr vs State Of Raj Asthan Through Pp on 30 May
Vijay Krishna Mehta vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr on 28 May, 2012
S. B
Union Of India (Uoi) (The) vs Trustees Of Major Maharaj Harisingh ... on 25 April, 2005
St. Edmunds Convent School vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 July, 2023
Author: Inderjeet Singh
Maharaja Sawai Bhawani Singh School vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 July, 2023
Author: Inderjeet
The Palace School vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 July, 2023
Author: Inderjeet Singh
Bench