Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 59235 (3.63 seconds)

M/S Kamla Aditya Construction vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 21 November, 2014

directed   the   Managing  Director, Housing Board to take steps for cancellation of development  agreement   executed   with   the   petitioner   and   other   developers.  Consequently,   vide   letter   dated ... directed the  Managing Director, Housing Board to take steps for cancellation of  development   agreement   executed   with   the   petitioner   and   other  developers. Consequently, vide letter dated
Jharkhand High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 2 - S Chandrashekhar - Full Document

Popular Estate Management Ltd.,, ... vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2),, ... on 29 August, 2017

Assessing Officer took up scrutiny. He perceived the above sequence of development and cancellation transactions as assessee's modus operandi inter alia indicating ... assessee's real estate development agreement embedded therein followed by development, cancellation and settlement deeds leading to avoidance of tax as the damages
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 40 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Dhara Jagdishchandra Patel, , ... vs Cit, A'Bad-Iii,, Ahmedabad on 3 May, 2017

bank account of that company. There was no genuine development agreement, cancellation of development agreement, correspondence for appointing of Arbitrator, and arbitration award by Shri ... With respect to the showcause notice, that there was no genuine development agreement,cancellation of development agreement, correspondence for appointing arbitrator and arbitration award
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 44 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax , ... vs Kohinoor Hatcheries Private Limited, ... on 3 May, 2019

agreement has been entered into between the parties subsequently or cancellation of development agreement in support of its contention. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer calculated ... same, he came to a different conclusion that there is no cancellation of development agreement therefore, possession is with the developer. We find that when
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 21 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next