Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 6245 (3.59 seconds)

Selvam vs State

common intention of committing theft and of comitting the murder of the deceased in order to commit theft of the car bearing Regn ... Theft after preparation made for causing death, hurt or restraint in order to the committing of the theft. Whoever commits theft, having made preparation

Abdul Majid Malik vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 20 March, 2017

conspiracy for theft and the other for conspiracy for theft as well as for being found in possession of the stolen car. Thus, Ld. Additional ... brought to Delhi to be impleaded falsely in this case   of   car   theft.     The   accused   had   to   bring   some   credible circumstances on record which would
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . (1)Kuldeep Kumar on 28 June, 2011

arrested the accused persons and accused persons made disclosure about theft of car bearing number DL2CJ­3873. He further stated that the said vehicle ... arrested the accused persons and accused persons made disclosure about theft of car bearing number DL2CJ­3873. The disclosure statement is Mark
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Santosh @ Lucky on 21 September, 2024

along with Constable Chetan Kumar, reached the scene of the car theft, which occurred at A-705 Sector-2 Rohini. He recorded the statement ... apprehension of Anil @ Tunda, who made a disclosure statement about the car theft. 26. PW-6/Ct. Chetan Kumar testified that on 13th January
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sandeep vs State Of U.P on 11 May, 2012

prove the motive for the crime. ix) The claim of theft of the car was not established before the trial Court in the manner known ... Indica car is ruled out and the presence of the car on the spot was indisputable, it should automatically follow that the car could have
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 110 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next