Commissioner Of Income Tax vs The Buckingham And Carnatic Company ... on 25 October, 1935
Equivalent citations: (1936)38BOMLR133
JUDGMENT
Lancelot Sanderson, J.
1. This ... said Act, are as follows:-
5. The Buckingham and Carnatic Company, Limited, (hereinafter referred to as " the company ") is a public limited company
Buckingham Carnatic Company Ltd. (Show ... vs Its Workmen on 14 May, 1959
Equivalent citations: (1959)IILLJ441BOM
JUDGMENT
1. This industrial dispute has been referred
Privy Council in Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras v. The Buckingham and Carnatic Co., Ltd. (1935) I.L.R. 59 Mad. 175. It is necessary ... Patna 12. In the Buskingham and Carnatic Co.s case the Privy Council decided in favour of the view taken by this High Court
Privy Council in Commissioner o4 Income-tax, Madras v. The Buckingham and Carnatic ... raise a question on Section 26 .
5. In the Buckingham and Carnatic Company case the Privy Council were dealing with an assessment for the year
respondent (first defendant) is that the midnight kattalai was founded by the Carnatic Rajas (and not, as claimed by the appellants, by their ancestors) that ... including the suit kattalai, were endowments made to the temple by the Carnatic Rajas for the benefit of the temple is regard to each
present case, have been construed by the Supreme Court in Buckingham and Carnatic Co. v. Venkatayya 1963 II LLJ 638 and in National Engineering Industries ... from work for a certain stipulated period without leave. In Buckingham and Carnatic Co. v. Venkatayya, (supra), the Standing Order was to the following effect
referred us to a decision of the Supreme Court in Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd. v. Venkatiah and another , reported ... Bench of the Madras High Court reported in Venkatayya v. Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd. and another, [1963-I L.L.J. 167], from which
Judgment of the Supreme Court in Workmen in Buckingham and Carnatic Mills, Madras v. Buckingham and Carnatic Mills, Madras reported ... Similarly, the Supreme Court in the case of Workmen in Buckingham and Carnatic Mills, Madras (supra) has laid down that merely because in a domestic
Chemicals and Fibers India [AIR 1979 SC 582],
xi. Buckingham & Carnatic Company Vs. Venkatiah and another
[AIR 1964 SC 1272],
xii. Shahoodul Haque ... Shri Prabhakaran has relied upon the following judgments:-
i. Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd. Vs. Venkatiah and another
[1963 (II) LLJ 638],
ii. Ridge
where Mahommedan influence has been predominant, such as Upper India and the Carnatic, the expression wakf is used to express dedication.
13. But the Mahommedan