decision of the Supreme Court in Workmen in Buckingham and
Carnatic Mills, Madras vs Buckingham and Carnatic Mills, Madras , 1970
LLJ 26, followed by this ... decided on 17.01.2012, wherein I relied upon the
decision in Buckingham and Carnatic Mills, Madras (supra) and a few
other cases. The relevant extract from
subsequent history of this Kattalai: Vijia Chockanatha ruled over the Carnatic until 1731. His wife, as guardian of his minor son was in possession ... Government assumed possession of the Madura District, because the Nabob of the Carnatic was not able to contribute his share of the expenses
Judgment of the Supreme Court in Workmen in Buckingham and Carnatic Mills, Madras v. Buckingham and Carnatic Mills, Madras reported ... Similarly, the Supreme Court in the case of Workmen in Buckingham and Carnatic Mills, Madras (supra) has laid down that merely because in a domestic
were invested in Flat No.405, 4 th
Floor, Wing C, Building Carnation, Raheja Gardens,
Vanawadi, Pune, Flat No.10094 having 2072 square foot ... Accused No.2.
14 Flat No.405, 4th Floor, Wing C, Building Carnation, Raheja 2200000
Gardens, Vanawadi Pune is in the name of Accused
possible view on the evidence on the record. (See
Buckingham & Carnatic Co. Ltd. vs The Workers
of the Company
possible view on the evidence on the record. (See Buckingham &
Carnatic Co. Ltd. Vs The Workers of the Company
Macca Venkayya, the first of this family, came from the "Carnatic, and rented five or six villages of Golapille or "Nujere
possible view on the evidence on the record. (See Buckingham & Carnatic Co. Ltd. v. Workers of the Company
employee as held by the Supreme Court in Workmen in Buckingham and Carnatic Mills Madras v. Buckingham and Carnatic Mills Madras
possible view on the evidence
on the record. (See Buckingham & Carnatic Co. Ltd. v. Workers of
the Company7 .)"
WP (C) No. 13747/2004
