3656/2019
17. This Court in Chanmuniya case further held as
under:-
"24. Thus, in those cases where a man, who
lived with ... maintenance in Section 125 is meant to
prevent."
18. Chanmuniya case referred to divergence of judicial
opinion on the interpretation of the word
this course of action are
stated hereinafter.
13.1. Firstly, in Chanmuniya case, the parties had been
living together for a long time and on that ... favour of a valid wedlock."
17. This Court in Chanmuniya case further held as
under:-
"24. Thus, in those cases where
living together could be reached."
[Ed.: As observed in Chanmuniya
case, (2011) 1 SCC 141, SCC p.
147, para 27.]
When the parties live ... circumstances of the case as
well as in the light of law laid down by Supreme Court in the cases of
Chanmuniya Vs. Virendra Kumar
living together could be
reached." [Ed.: As observed in Chanmuniya case, (2011) 1
SCC 141, SCC p. 147, para 27.]
When the parties live ... entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.
17. This Court in Chanmuniya case [ Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar
Singh Kushwaha
would arise in favour of a valid wedlock.”
This Court in Chanmuniya case further held as under:-
“24. Thus, in those cases where ... maintenance in
Section 125 is meant to prevent.” [underlining added]
17. Chanmuniya case referred to divergence of judicial opinion
on the interpretation of the word
arise in
favour of a valid wedlock."
This Court in Chanmuniya case further held as under:-
24. Thus, in those cases where ... Section 125 is meant to prevent."
[underlining added]
17. Chanmuniya case referred to divergence of
judicial opinion on the interpretation of the word
favour of a valid
wedlock.
17. This Court in Chanmuniya case further held as under:-
œ24. Thus, in those cases where ... â€ÂÂÂ
[underlining added]
18. Chanmuniya case referred to divergence of judicial opinion
on the interpretation of the word
arise in favour of a valid
wedlock." This Court in Chanmuniya case further held as under:-
"24. Thus, in those cases where ... Section 125 is meant to prevent." [underlining added]
17. Chanmuniya case referred to divergence of judicial opinion on
the interpretation of the word
nature of
summary proceedings.
12. Second case which we would like to refer is Chanmuniya vs.
Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha & Anr. [4] The Court ... this course of action are stated
hereinafter.
15. Firstly, in Chanmuniya case, the parties had been living
together for a long time and on that
matter be also tagged along with the aforesaid
case. However, in the facts of the present case, we do
not deem it proper ... this course of action are stated
hereinafter.
15. Firstly, in Chanmuniya case, the parties had
been living together for a long time and on that
